Thursday, 29 August 2013
I'll house you
1) increase the supply of accommodation so push down on private rents, cutting the cost of housing benefit and private rentals
2) create assets that could be sold off, if required, at a later date
3) before then generate revenues
4) you know, provide people with decent homes
5) address the horrendous problem with the bedroom tax which is the poor sods getting clobbered with it don't have alternative accommodation to move in to
6) create thousands and thousands of jobs and opportunities for apprenticeships
7) be used to regenerate/rejuvenate areas
8) be accurately costed and start generating at least some of the above benefits way before completion
By contrast HS2 will:
1) Do hee haw to ticket prices other than cause them to be raised to cover the cost of it
2) cost spectacularly more than current estimates. We know this. We also know that the later phases will be postponed indefinitely - wrote someone who cycles past the Edinburgh trams every day - undermining the rationale for doing it in the first place
3) become simply one part of a broader, subsidised network
4) because of the way procurement works, it'll generate all sorts of fat contracts for non-UK companies that means the benefits of the government spending involved will leak overseas
5) be based on mickey mouse notions of its economic benefits whereas the reality will see it suck even more economic activity darn sarth
6) waste time and money until phase 1 is complete.
7) let some English people feel less inadequate about the state of British railways vs the French
So yeah, why can't we have a massive social housing building programme now* rather than cutting however many minutes off the time it takes to get from Manchester to Leeds in however many decades time?
In the meantime, help to buy is all very good, ish. No, not really, not at all. Essentially, its a lower and middle middle class subsidy that will crank up personal debt levels as it bumps up housebuilder profits, but does hee haw about supply and is generally mental.
* rhetorical question. Successive governments have clung to a dogmatic prejudice against state social housing provision even when, as is obviously the case right now, building more would very obviously be a very good thing for the entire economy.