That the total rewards paid to FTSE company directors grew 14%
over the past year was as predictable as it was repugnant,so lets have some fun at the scrounging, subsidised bastards’ expense. Yeah,
that’s right, according to the right’s own arguments all these FTSE boys are
subsidised scroungers.
Here’s how; reading thru some of the details it turns out the
bulk of the gains were from “share-based long-term incentives” i.e. if a
company’s share price goes up, the execs get the mega moolah. This is terribly
lovely until you realise that for years now monetary policy in Britain, in particular
quantitative easing, has been geared to boosting asset values. And shares are an
asset i.e. a big swodge of the gains executives creamed off this year are hee
haw to do with them and plenty to do with a policy the British Chambers of
Commerce says, according to CNBC, is debasing the pound!
As for the subsidies, well, lets get realistic for a minute
and ignore all the annual report and account bollocks about how such and such a
thought-leadership-best-in-class business strategy is delivering real gains;
the bulk of the business costs being cut in Britain today are to do with labour
be it via redundancies, shorter hours, pay freezes or the closure of pension
schemes. Now, what happens when pay gets cut or people laid off? That’s right
tax credits and unemployment benefits pick up the strain i.e. the government
i.e. us, is subsidising all the supposedly best in class business models all
these FTSE douchebags claim they’ve successfully implemented ahead of plan.
Then there’s the very, VERY obvious point, which is in an
economy still miles away from trend growth of c. 2.5% a year, if the cash all these
execs get goes up 14% a year, they’re getting an even bigger slice
of the cake. So yeah, sure, mebbe the UK
GDP dead cat is bouncing for a change, but so what given all of the benefits are
getting ripped off by the already very rich; as it stands things work for them,
but no-one else or to quote the CBI on recent (below inflation i.e. waaaaay
below 14% per annum) pay rises “It's clear that pay restraint is continuing to
underpin employment growth. We expect wages to pick up next year, but sustained
growth must come first to protect jobs” i.e. we’re all expected to endure yet another
year of real terms pay cuts for the greater good whilst the
subsidised, scroungers in charge get 14% increases for managing
mediocre, subsidised growth.
This brings us to the spectre of deflation currently
haunting the Eurozone. Now the mechanics of why deflation is typically regarded as a bad thing are
clear enough; if prices fall, then consumers and businesses are wracked by
uncertainty and likely to postpone spending e.g. why buy a widget making
machine today, when (a) it might be cheaper tomorrow and (b) the widgets it
makes will sell for less than you thought when you bought it.
But, speaking as an employee and as a consumer so what? In the
current environment one thing I’m certain about is that my pay is set to fall
further behind prices i.e. its real value is going to keep falling for the forseeable future so to
me a dose of deflation, given it would boost the real value of my pay, is a
good thing.
Besides, the arguments against deflation looking pretty weak from my perspective. Like, bearing in mind my marginal propensity to consume is much higher than a FTSE executive’s which is an important thing in the consumer driven UK economy, its not as if I can actually postpone the bulk of my spending given it involves things like food and monthly bills. And as for consumer durables, well, what characterised the NICE decade if it wasn’t ever cheaper, ever higher spec Chinese made goods that people kept buying in spades regardless? So actually, falling prices have a very obvious appeal; but ahhh, this would undermine business confidence and investment and ultimately economic growth – except, so what? Right now, as the 14% FTSE subsidy junkie increase makes abundantly clear, any gains, however teeny, will just be creamed off by a swathe of fat, fat fatty cats whilst me and pretty much everyone else in Britain gets less than hee haw, so feck it, lets have some deflation i.e. the hurtling extent of inequality is such, what is and isn't a good thing for the economy is increasingly a matter of where you sit in the class structure *.
Besides, the arguments against deflation looking pretty weak from my perspective. Like, bearing in mind my marginal propensity to consume is much higher than a FTSE executive’s which is an important thing in the consumer driven UK economy, its not as if I can actually postpone the bulk of my spending given it involves things like food and monthly bills. And as for consumer durables, well, what characterised the NICE decade if it wasn’t ever cheaper, ever higher spec Chinese made goods that people kept buying in spades regardless? So actually, falling prices have a very obvious appeal; but ahhh, this would undermine business confidence and investment and ultimately economic growth – except, so what? Right now, as the 14% FTSE subsidy junkie increase makes abundantly clear, any gains, however teeny, will just be creamed off by a swathe of fat, fat fatty cats whilst me and pretty much everyone else in Britain gets less than hee haw, so feck it, lets have some deflation i.e. the hurtling extent of inequality is such, what is and isn't a good thing for the economy is increasingly a matter of where you sit in the class structure *.
* The bigger point here is the growth in economic inequality
and all that entails is, besides being unjustifiable in its own terms, very
obviously socially and politically corrosive and, increasingly, a threat to the
economy. As for the CBI bod quoted above, every employer, the Tories etc., they really should
think about Orwell’s chat about Lenin I think it was; “You can’t make an
omelette without breaking eggs.”, “Yes, but where is the
omelette?
No comments:
Post a Comment